The very foundation of evolution is the assumption that all things happen by pure chance and that by chance the right chemicals came together in the right way to form life.  Science is based on the assumption that there is a reason for everything and that all things happen according to rules of nature that can be determined by careful examination {i.e. nothing happens by pure chance}. This means that evolution is anti-scientific by its very nature.  It is in fact a philosophy of life NOT properly speaking a scientific theory.  It must be believed on faith, since scientific evidence does not support it.

The only reason the theory of evolution is still around is due to the fact that some people do not want to believe the Bible is true because of their life style. {Acknowledging that there is a purpose for everything and established laws of nature implies that there is a Creator Who established those laws and Who will hold us accountable for our actions.}

1. Evolution is a direct contradiction of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (All processes, chemical and physical tend to increasing disorder.) [Laws of science are mathematically and  experimentally established facts to which no exception has ever been found. If a single exception is found -- it is not a Law!!]
2. Experiments by Gregor Mendell and modern experiments with the fruit fly all show that although changes within a given specie may occur, any "new" specie developed either by hybridization or mutation is always sterile. The mule is a shining example.
3. Genetics teaches that acquired traits cannot be passed on to offspring.
4. Fossils of fish in the Eocene strata on the Pacific coast, 700 - 800 feet above sea level, 30 - 40 miles from the beach, and fossils of algae and crayfish assumed to be 300 million years old, and fossils of grasshoppers in the Grasshopper Glacier in Montana, all show that no evolution has taken place in any of these species.
5. If evolution ever went on in the past it should still be going on today, but of all the uncountable trillions of protozoa studied by scientists through the years none has ever been found to show any signs of evolution.
6. Paleontology (study of fossils) reveals that in every case different species degenerate instead of evolve -- in complete agreement with the laws of Thermodynamics.      [Evolutionists often argue that degeneration is the same as evolution. This may sound good philosophically, but it is scientifically untrue.  If it were the same we could invent a machine which produces more energy than it uses.  This would violate the second law of thermodynamics.]
7. Paleontology also reveals that the so-called "geological column" does not exist anywhere in the world.  If evolution were true, the geological column should be the rule, not the exception.  In actual fact, fragments of the column are found here and fragments are found there, but no consistent column anywhere.  In deed, fossils from all "geological ages" are often mixed together in the same geological stratum.  As Dr. Henry Morris and John Whitcomb demonstrated in the 1960's, the layering of the fossil record is better explained by a universal flood, and the laws of physics -- hydrology and buoyancy, than by "geological ages."
8. Fossils in nature are the exception, not the rule.  In nature when an organism dies it decays and only rarely forms a fossil.  In order for fossilization to occur, an organism must be buried and the air flow restricted to the decay process while minerals seep into the dead organism.  The fact that fossils are found everywhere on the surface of the earth, even atop the highest mountains is better explained by a universal flood than by any other explanation ever conceived of.
9. The earth's atmosphere is now known to be in a state of  radioactive non-equilibrium (in fact it is not even close to being in equilibrium). Mathematical models demonstrate that this equilibrium would be attained in approximately 30,000 years.
10. The earth's magnetic field has been constantly decaying at a consistent rate since records have been kept beginning in the 1800's. By back extrapolation of the earth's magnetic field decay rate we can verify that beyond 10,000 years the gausian {magnetic} forces would generate such heat as to make the earth uninhabitable to life as we know it. (Supposed reversals in the magnetic field in no way affect the strength of that field.)
11 Evolutionists hold that life consists of physical and  chemical reactions, yet science clearly demonstrates that the laws of physics and chemistry rule out any possibility of evolution.
12.  Science states that matter and energy must be conserved and can neither be created nor destroyed.  [First Law of Thermodynamics.]
13.  Modern Biogenetic research has demonstrated millions of times over what Louis Pasteur stated over a hundred years ago:  "Life does not come from non-living sources."  Putting proteins, or genes together, even in the right order does not create life! We have also discovered that the genetic codes found in DNA and RNA are not sufficient for life.  DNA and RNA cannot "live" outside a cell membrane.  This means that DNA and RNA have to come into being inside a cell membrane all at once for life to exist.  You can't create DNA then create RNA then create a cell membrane and put it all together and have life!
14. The simplest life form is infinitely more complex than than the most complicated, sophisticated device ever made by mankind.  The mathematical probability that even the lowest life form happened by chance is astronomically beyond our comprehension. It is hard to imagine anyone believing that a computer could simply come into existence by pure chance, yet the simplest of life forms is far more complex than any computer in existence.
15.  Modern biogenetics now enables us to examine DNA, RNA and genetic structures in ways that were not even possible before the new millennium.  We can genetically do detailed maps of genes and yes even clone animals.  One of the things we discover in all of this is that every part of every specie is clear and distinct and peculiar to that specie.  The blood of a human for, example, is not the same as the blood of an ape, or a dog, or any other animal.  The bones of a human are not the same genetically as the bones of an ape.  To an evolutionist, the fact that humans resemble apes is proof of evolution, but genetically, even the bone structure which allows a man to walk upright is not the same as the bone structure of an ape.  Every aspect of every specie is unique to that specie--- and modern biogenetics has proven that beyond a shadow of a doubt.   Chromosome counts of species prove beyond a doubt that the so called evolutionary path is totally invalid.  There is no scientific evolutionary path that corresponds genetically by species, size, or even by animal or plant kingdom.  {A donkey has 62 chromosomes, man has 46 -- who descended from whom?}
For more on this subject see my link to:    www.pathlights.com
 

Whatever else may be said about evolution, it is but a fairy tale.  A frog changing to a prince with a kiss from a maiden is a fairy tale --  whether it takes place instaneously or over millions of years.  It is physically, chemically, and biologically impossible.